4JQN

Crystal structure of Cytochrome C Peroxidase W191G-Gateless in complex with 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.36 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.139 
  • R-Value Work: 0.114 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.117 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.

Rocklin, G.J.Boyce, S.E.Fischer, M.Fish, I.Mobley, D.L.Shoichet, B.K.Dill, K.A.

(2013) J Mol Biol 425: 4569-4583

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2013.07.030
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    4JM5, 4JM6, 4JM8, 4JM9, 4JMA, 4JMW, 4JPL, 4JPT, 4JPU, 4JQJ, 4JQK, 4JQM, 4JQN

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Predicting absolute protein-ligand binding affinities remains a frontier challenge in ligand discovery and design. This becomes more difficult when ionic interactions are involved because of the large opposing solvation and electrostatic attraction energies. In a blind test, we examined whether alchemical free-energy calculations could predict binding affinities of 14 charged and 5 neutral compounds previously untested as ligands for a cavity binding site in cytochrome c peroxidase. In this simplified site, polar and cationic ligands compete with solvent to interact with a buried aspartate. Predictions were tested by calorimetry, spectroscopy, and crystallography. Of the 15 compounds predicted to bind, 13 were experimentally confirmed, while 4 compounds were false negative predictions. Predictions had a root-mean-square error of 1.95 kcal/mol to the experimental affinities, and predicted poses had an average RMSD of 1.7Å to the crystallographic poses. This test serves as a benchmark for these thermodynamically rigorous calculations at predicting binding affinities for charged compounds and gives insights into the existing sources of error, which are primarily electrostatic interactions inside proteins. Our experiments also provide a useful set of ionic binding affinities in a simplified system for testing new affinity prediction methods.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, San Francisco, CA 94143-2550, USA; Biophysics Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, San Francisco, CA 94143-2550, USA.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Cytochrome c peroxidase289Saccharomyces cerevisiae RM11-1aMutation(s): 2 
Gene Names: CCP1 CCP CPO YKR066CSCRG_04081
EC: 1.11.1.5 (PDB Primary Data), 1.11.1 (UniProt)
UniProt
Find proteins for B3LRE1 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain RM11-1a))
Explore B3LRE1 
Go to UniProtKB:  B3LRE1
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupB3LRE1
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.36 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.139 
  • R-Value Work: 0.114 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.117 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 50.968α = 90
b = 74.786β = 90
c = 106.524γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
ADSCdata collection
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2013-07-31
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2013-10-09
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2013-11-20
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2024-02-28
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations