Solution NMR Structure of PHD Type 1 Zinc Finger Domain 1 of Lysine-specific Demethylase Lid from Drosophila melanogaster, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) Target FR824J
SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
1 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
2 | 3D HNCO | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
3 | 3D CBCA(CO)NH | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
4 | 3D HNCACB | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
5 | 3D HBHA(CO)NH | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
6 | 3D simutaneous 13C-aromatic,13C-aliphatic,15N edited 1H-1H NOESY | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
7 | 2D 1H-13C ct HSQC aliphatic | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
8 | 2D 1H-13C ct HSQC aromatic | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
9 | 3D HN(CA)CO | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
10 | 3D (H)CCH-COSY-ali | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
11 | 3D (H)CCH-COSY aro | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
12 | 3D (H)CCH-TOCSY ali | 0.321 mM 13C and 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
13 | 2D gNfHSQC_His | 0.321 mM 10% 13C and 100% 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
14 | 2D 1H-15N HSQC | 0.321 mM 10% 13C and 100% 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
15 | 2D 1H-13C ct-HSQC(28ms) | 0.321 mM 10% 13C and 100% 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
16 | 2D 1H-13C ct- HSQC(42ms) | 0.321 mM 10% 13C and 100% 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
17 | 2D 1H-13C ct-HSQC(56ms) | 0.321 mM 10% 13C and 100% 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 | ||
18 | 2D J-modulation 1H-15N HSQC | 0.321 mM 10% 13C and 100% 15N labeled protein | 90% H2O/10% D2O | 6.5 | ambient | 298 |
NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
1 | Varian | INOVA | 750 |
2 | Varian | INOVA | 600 |
NMR Refinement | ||
---|---|---|
Method | Details | Software |
simulated annealing | Structure determination was performed by running CYANA and ASDP in parallel using NOE-based constraints and PHI and PSI dihedral angle constraints from TALOS+. Consensus peak assignments were selected and used in iterative refinement with CYANA. The 20 conformers out of 100 with the lowest target function were further refined by simulated annealing in explicit water bath using the program CNS with PARAM19 force field NMR Ensemble Information | CNS |
NMR Ensemble Information | |
---|---|
Conformer Selection Criteria | target function |
Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
Representative Model | 1 (lowest energy) |
Computation: NMR Software | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
1 | refinement | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
2 | structure solution | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
3 | geometry optimization | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
4 | processing | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
5 | data analysis | CNS | Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read | |
6 | refinement | PROSA | Guntert | |
7 | structure solution | PROSA | Guntert | |
8 | geometry optimization | PROSA | Guntert | |
9 | processing | PROSA | Guntert | |
10 | data analysis | PROSA | Guntert | |
11 | refinement | CARA | Keller and Wuthrich | |
12 | structure solution | CARA | Keller and Wuthrich | |
13 | geometry optimization | CARA | Keller and Wuthrich | |
14 | processing | CARA | Keller and Wuthrich | |
15 | data analysis | CARA | Keller and Wuthrich | |
16 | refinement | CSI | David Wishart,Leigh Willard,Tim Jellard,Brian Sykes | |
17 | sstructure solution | CSI | David Wishart,Leigh Willard,Tim Jellard,Brian Sykes | |
18 | geometry optimization | CSI | David Wishart,Leigh Willard,Tim Jellard,Brian Sykes | |
19 | processing | CSI | David Wishart,Leigh Willard,Tim Jellard,Brian Sykes | |
20 | data analysis | CSI | David Wishart,Leigh Willard,Tim Jellard,Brian Sykes | |
21 | refinement | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
22 | geometry optimization | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
23 | structure solution | CYANA | 3.0 | Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich |
24 | data analysis | AutoStructure | 2.1 | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione |
25 | refinement | AutoStructure | 2.1 | Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione |
26 | data analysis | AutoAssign | 2.1 | Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione |
27 | chemical shift assignment | AutoAssign | 2.1 | Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione |
28 | data analysis | XEASY | Bartels et al. | |
29 | collection | VnmrJ | Varian | |
30 | geometry optimization | TALOS+ | Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax | |
31 | structure validation | PSVS | Bhattacharya, Montelione | |
32 | data analysis | MOLMOL | Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich |